Introduction: The Emirates Mars Mission (EMM) Emirates Mars InfraRed Spectrometer (EMIRS) instrument is a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer designed to observe the Martian disk, with the primary scientific objective of determining the three-dimensional thermal state of the lower atmosphere and its diurnal variability on sub-seasonal timescales [1]. EMIRS uses a 3x3 array of deuterated L-alanine doped triglycine sulfate (DLaTGS) pyroelectric detectors [1], however, following the integration of the EMIRS electronics with the optical and mechanical hardware it was observed that the performance of the off-axis (non-central) detectors of the array were lower than expected [1]. Investigations into the performance of these off-axis detectors has so far yielded inconclusive root causes. As EMIRS could meet its primary science objective with the on-axis (central) detector and was subject to a pressing instrument schedule, a project level decision was made to forgo any additional investigation and instead rely on the on-axis detector [1][2]. Method: In this study we present a comparison of observations captured by EMIRS from the off-axis detectors against the on-axis detector. The comparison is performed via a top-down and bottom-up pathway approach using the EMM Science Team processing pipeline. The top-down pathway focuses on the effects of the pre-processing steps on the detector interferograms, whereas the bottom-up approach compares calibrated radiances derived from the pipeline with and without applying the pre-processing steps [3] [4]. Correction of these issues will expand the retrieval derived products by a factor of five. Results: The top-down comparison shows differences in terms interferogram amplitude and phase error between on and off-axis detectors. We assess the feasibility of correction, then apply correction methods to a subset of EMIRS observations, and propose the root cause of the issues. This study is presented along with the generation of a joint dataset of near-mutual EMIRS and EXI (Emirates eXploration Imager) observations [5].